|
Probably not!
Why? Because your risk of being hit or killed, or at best, be severely injured, would rise dramatically.
So if you knew that the chances of your baby dying were up to 3 times higher, would you choose to plan for a 'home birth' rather than a hospital birth, where all the medical back-up is right there on the spot?
No, not unless you are foolish and deny that up to half of all first time mothers attempting a home birth have to be transferred to hospital due to complications!!
That dash to hospital may be the difference between life and death for your baby - or you.
Danni, ever heard of common sense?
It seems that plenty of people have the opposite opinion and if you are on that side of the fence, you are arguing against a strong set of numbers. The latest studies from the USA and Europe which involved a total of over 549,000 mothers (that's over half a million!) showed that planned home births have almost three times the risk of neonatal deaths as do hospital births.
And by the way, 'natural' low intervention births can be achieved in birthing centres attached to some hospitals.
Money can buy many things but it can't buy common sense, and common sense seems to be becoming more uncommon these days... (like some people still actually smoke cigarettes even though each cigarette has over 200 lethal chemicals in it! - hello?) if I gave you a bottle of liquid with 200 poisons in it, would you drink it?
Anyway, like most things in life, it's your call ... the risky way or the safer way ... your call.
|